Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18091 - 18100 of 64987 for or b.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2019-20). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434106 - 2021-10-06

WI App 76 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP307-CR Complete Titl...
, v. Nely B. Robles, Defendant-Appellant.† Opinion Filed: May 1, 2013 Submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96029 - 2013-06-25

Richard Pierce v. Gary Norwick
a violation of Wis. Adm. Code § ATCP 134.06(4)(b), which states, “No landlord may intentionally misrepresent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10216 - 2005-03-31

City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
as to: (a) Substantially annoy, injure, or endanger the comfort, health, repose, or safety of the public; (b) In any way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14482 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
representative. The sequestration order therefore would not apply to him. See Wis. Stat. § 906.15(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35450 - 2009-02-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
six factors: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699950 - 2023-09-13

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Collins
(a). B. Count Two. By failing to promptly deliver the funds to the lien holder, despite the court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16819 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 76
-RESPONDENT, V. NELY B. ROBLES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.† Opinion Filed: May 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96029 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
termination. No. 2017AP1078 7 (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201482 - 2017-11-14

State v. James A. Torpen
. § 973.09 also addresses restitution. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(1)(b) states that the court “shall order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31