Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18091 - 18100 of 64147 for records/1000.
Search results 18091 - 18100 of 64147 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the records, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251758 - 2019-12-26
review of the records, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251758 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the writ of restitution was filed and denied by the trial court. The record contains documentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28577 - 2014-09-15
of the writ of restitution was filed and denied by the trial court. The record contains documentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28577 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.”). Whether a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.”). Whether a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
State v. John R. Martin
of the record, we conclude that his analysis of the issues is correct. In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11306 - 2005-03-31
of the record, we conclude that his analysis of the issues is correct. In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a hearing about the GAL fee issue. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
a hearing about the GAL fee issue. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no position with respect to this appeal. Based upon our review of Griswold’s brief and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816115 - 2024-06-20
no position with respect to this appeal. Based upon our review of Griswold’s brief and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816115 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Justin H.
a residential treatment center and asserts that the record provides no valid reason for No. 95-2038-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9425 - 2017-09-19
a residential treatment center and asserts that the record provides no valid reason for No. 95-2038-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9425 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245465 - 2019-08-19
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245465 - 2019-08-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99522 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an arrearage of $6,484.70, calculated as 14.11% of income established by LaCrosse’s social security records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188816 - 2017-09-21
an arrearage of $6,484.70, calculated as 14.11% of income established by LaCrosse’s social security records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188816 - 2017-09-21