Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 63404 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 63404 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
FA-4184V; Declaration of Efforts to Serve Respondent
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: FA-4184V, 09/24
/formdisplay/FA-4184V.pdf?formNumber=FA-4184V&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-28
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: FA-4184V, 09/24
/formdisplay/FA-4184V.pdf?formNumber=FA-4184V&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-28
[MS WORD]
GF-179: Confidential Petition Addendum
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: 1 Enter
/formdisplay/GF-179.doc?formNumber=GF-179&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-04-09
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: 1 Enter
/formdisplay/GF-179.doc?formNumber=GF-179&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
AMCO made to the Stricklands. The court reasoned the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90300 - 2013-02-10
AMCO made to the Stricklands. The court reasoned the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90300 - 2013-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer that failed to specify separate sums for Strickland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90300 - 2014-09-15
the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer that failed to specify separate sums for Strickland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90300 - 2014-09-15
State v. Julius L. Arberry
-2000).[2] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Arberry claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4320 - 2005-03-31
-2000).[2] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Arberry claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4320 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
of appellate rights, the ?benefit-estoppel doctrine? and requirements for filing post-trial motions when a case
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=184&year=2010
of appellate rights, the ?benefit-estoppel doctrine? and requirements for filing post-trial motions when a case
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=184&year=2010
[PDF]
WI 85
abuse injunction creates a rebuttable presumption in child custody proceedings that joint legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29560 - 2014-09-15
abuse injunction creates a rebuttable presumption in child custody proceedings that joint legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29560 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Total cases filed by county/by year for last three years (2024)
(1996) BROWN 2022 2023 2024 VILLAGE OF BELLEVUE 1,332 1,325 952* * * HOBART & LAWRENCE JOINT MU
/publications/statistics/municipal/docs/threeyear24.pdf - 2025-09-17
(1996) BROWN 2022 2023 2024 VILLAGE OF BELLEVUE 1,332 1,325 952* * * HOBART & LAWRENCE JOINT MU
/publications/statistics/municipal/docs/threeyear24.pdf - 2025-09-17
Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
for the children through her employment. After mediation, the parties agreed to joint legal custody and a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14863 - 2005-03-31
for the children through her employment. After mediation, the parties agreed to joint legal custody and a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14863 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
employment. After mediation, the parties agreed to joint legal custody and a physical placement schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14863 - 2017-09-21
employment. After mediation, the parties agreed to joint legal custody and a physical placement schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14863 - 2017-09-21