Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
from an order denying his motion to vacate and dismiss a September 2001 judgment entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30558 - 2014-09-15
from an order denying his motion to vacate and dismiss a September 2001 judgment entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30558 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion to vacate and dismiss a September 2001 judgment entered against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30558 - 2007-10-09
from an order denying his motion to vacate and dismiss a September 2001 judgment entered against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30558 - 2007-10-09
[PDF]
WI 85
abuse injunction creates a rebuttable presumption in child custody proceedings that joint legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29560 - 2014-09-15
abuse injunction creates a rebuttable presumption in child custody proceedings that joint legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29560 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ joint account to make mortgage payments. Pursuant to a temporary order, Marc had been depositing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135536 - 2015-02-24
the parties’ joint account to make mortgage payments. Pursuant to a temporary order, Marc had been depositing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135536 - 2015-02-24
CA Blank Order
Hinkel, who has made no motion to withdraw the no-merit report. Crump was sent a copy of the report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
Hinkel, who has made no motion to withdraw the no-merit report. Crump was sent a copy of the report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
CA Blank Order
to a crime; and disorderly conduct. The circuit court denied a motion to suppress. Mulcahy pleaded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91597 - 2005-03-31
to a crime; and disorderly conduct. The circuit court denied a motion to suppress. Mulcahy pleaded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Total cases filed by county/by year for last three years (2023)
JOINT MU 1,377 1,265 0* * *LAWRENCE HOBART DISTRICT VIII RESERVE 0 * SUAMICO AREA JOINT COURT 736
/publications/statistics/municipal/docs/threeyear23.pdf - 2025-09-17
JOINT MU 1,377 1,265 0* * *LAWRENCE HOBART DISTRICT VIII RESERVE 0 * SUAMICO AREA JOINT COURT 736
/publications/statistics/municipal/docs/threeyear23.pdf - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
Donald Wollheim v. University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc.
as follows: 1) The Foundation and the Medical School were joint employers and jointly hired him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19405 - 2017-09-21
as follows: 1) The Foundation and the Medical School were joint employers and jointly hired him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19405 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer that failed to specify separate sums for Strickland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90300 - 2014-09-15
the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer that failed to specify separate sums for Strickland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90300 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
AMCO made to the Stricklands. The court reasoned the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90300 - 2013-02-10
AMCO made to the Stricklands. The court reasoned the offer was invalid because it was a joint offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90300 - 2013-02-10