Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 30191 for de.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 30191 for de.
10AP2672 State v. Matthew M. Gilbert.doc
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05
[PDF]
v. Jane Peckham
, and Peckham sought a trial de novo under § 799.207(3), STATS. Spitz then renewed her summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11029 - 2017-09-19
, and Peckham sought a trial de novo under § 799.207(3), STATS. Spitz then renewed her summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11029 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
2011 WI APP 54
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61123 - 2011-05-08
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61123 - 2011-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the injunction presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The dispute among the parties arises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238119 - 2019-03-27
the injunction presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The dispute among the parties arises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238119 - 2019-03-27
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
. 12-23-2008 Affirmed 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35519 - 2009-02-08
. 12-23-2008 Affirmed 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35519 - 2009-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
even though the party has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30471 - 2007-10-01
even though the party has not moved therefor.”). II. ¶8 We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30471 - 2007-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49797 - 2010-05-11
to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de novo review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49797 - 2010-05-11
v. Jane Peckham
. A court commissioner granted the summary judgment motion, and Peckham sought a trial de novo under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31
. A court commissioner granted the summary judgment motion, and Peckham sought a trial de novo under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31
Jesus Barbary v. James R. Sturm
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review. Id. at 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review. Id. at 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31