Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 30059 for de.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment in a TPR case is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75092 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment in a TPR case is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75092 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
[PDF]
Douglas Katerinos v. Chase Bankcard Services, Inc.
any articulable claim.” II. ¶6 We review de novo the trial court’s decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6677 - 2017-09-20
any articulable claim.” II. ¶6 We review de novo the trial court’s decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6677 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Appleton v. Lamar J. Tyrrell
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J. 1 Lamar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4518 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J. 1 Lamar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4518 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05
review de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
Charles T. Wagner v. Madison Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120, ¶3, 244 Wis. 2d 280, ___, 628 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3272 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120, ¶3, 244 Wis. 2d 280, ___, 628 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3272 - 2017-09-19
07AP2039 State v. John E. Gobis.doc
of law that we review de novo. “To the extent the circuit court’s decision involves findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04
of law that we review de novo. “To the extent the circuit court’s decision involves findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04
Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
approval was illegal. Cramer appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5268 - 2005-03-31
approval was illegal. Cramer appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5268 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sayoomporn Ostrum v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
injuries are scheduled rather than non-scheduled. Ostrum therefore argues for de novo review. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10466 - 2017-09-20
injuries are scheduled rather than non-scheduled. Ostrum therefore argues for de novo review. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10466 - 2017-09-20
Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie
complaint, Anderson requested a trial de novo in the circuit court. See § 799.207(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31
complaint, Anderson requested a trial de novo in the circuit court. See § 799.207(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31