Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 2641 for hill's.

COURT OF APPEALS
performed within the scope of their official duties.” Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 10, 546 N.W.2d 151
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118463 - 2014-07-28

[PDF] NOTICE
heading in his direction and that as he approached the crest of a hill, he could see a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53538 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Larenzo M.C.
, and the matter was set for disposition. Larenzo was subsequently placed at Lincoln Hills, a secured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6819 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Mary Ellen Kuesel v. Firstar Trust Company
and interpret the applicable law.” Thorin v. Bloomfield Hills Bd. of Educ., 513 N.W.2d 230, 236 (Mich. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4732 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the scope of their official duties.” Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 10, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). This rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118463 - 2014-09-15

Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
task.” Meyer v. Carman, 271 Wis. 329, 331-32, 73 N.W.2d 514 (1955); see also Kimps v. Hill, 187 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31

Bruce L. Ottinger v. Jose Pinel
us is whether the Guards are entitled to immunity. See Kimps v. Hill, 187 Wis.2d 508, 514, 523 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Paula Woychik v. Ruzic Construction
for negligence in the performance of a ministerial duty. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 10, 546 N.W.2d 151
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3782 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Dorothy Caraher v. City of Menomonie
duty is a question of law, not a question of fact. Kimps v. Hill, 187 Wis. 2d 508, 513, 523 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4491 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance pursuant to Strickland. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 56–57 (1985); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88220 - 2014-09-15