Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 9124 for op.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 9124 for op.
Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
, unpublished slip op. at 3 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 22, 2000). Seibert then filed a petition for a writ of habeas
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17591 - 2005-03-31
, unpublished slip op. at 3 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 22, 2000). Seibert then filed a petition for a writ of habeas
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17591 - 2005-03-31
State v. Margaret H.
., No. 99-1441, unpublished slip op., 7-8 (Ct. App. July 27, 1999). The court of appeals then reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17525 - 2005-03-31
., No. 99-1441, unpublished slip op., 7-8 (Ct. App. July 27, 1999). The court of appeals then reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17525 - 2005-03-31
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
. v. City of Glendale, No. 2003AP1170, unpublished slip op. ¶2 (WI App Mar. 19, 2004) (footnote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
. v. City of Glendale, No. 2003AP1170, unpublished slip op. ¶2 (WI App Mar. 19, 2004) (footnote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not at issue in this appeal. See State v. E.B., No. 2022AP1882, unpublished slip op. (WI App Jan. 18, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632614 - 2023-03-14
are not at issue in this appeal. See State v. E.B., No. 2022AP1882, unpublished slip op. (WI App Jan. 18, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632614 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
years’ extended supervision. See State v. Diehl, No. 2006AP2860-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶2 (WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91835 - 2014-09-15
years’ extended supervision. See State v. Diehl, No. 2006AP2860-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶2 (WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91835 - 2014-09-15
State v. William Napper
, slip op. at 1.[2] I. Background. The Nappers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
, slip op. at 1.[2] I. Background. The Nappers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arbitration”); see also Thompson v. Town of Brooklyn, No. 2011AP210, unpublished slip op. ¶20 (WI App Apr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=748386 - 2024-01-10
arbitration”); see also Thompson v. Town of Brooklyn, No. 2011AP210, unpublished slip op. ¶20 (WI App Apr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=748386 - 2024-01-10
CA Blank Order
, unpublished op. and order (WI App Aug. 25, 2009). That decision established the law of the case, which must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97121 - 2013-05-21
, unpublished op. and order (WI App Aug. 25, 2009). That decision established the law of the case, which must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97121 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
Daniel Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, LLC
of appeals, Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, unpublished per curiam op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 24, 2003), should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16598 - 2017-09-21
of appeals, Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, unpublished per curiam op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 24, 2003), should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16598 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, LLC
of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, unpublished per curiam op. (Wis. Ct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16598 - 2005-03-31
of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, unpublished per curiam op. (Wis. Ct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16598 - 2005-03-31