Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 44722 for part.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 44722 for part.
2009 WI APP 144
: Stephen a. Simanek, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40584 - 2009-10-27
: Stephen a. Simanek, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40584 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
Mary Herr v. Rodolph J. Lanaghan
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL GUOLEE, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21580 - 2017-09-21
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL GUOLEE, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21580 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking to amend the information to add three additional charges, based in part on testimony David gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
seeking to amend the information to add three additional charges, based in part on testimony David gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
[PDF]
State v. David J. Lenz
FROEHLICH, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15331 - 2017-09-21
FROEHLICH, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
statements were part of the polygraph examination, and therefore are not admissible. ¶5 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33867 - 2014-09-15
statements were part of the polygraph examination, and therefore are not admissible. ¶5 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William D. Morin v. Watertown Leasing Co., Inc.
from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14357 - 2014-09-15
from a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
of the circuit court for Dane County: DIANE M. NICKS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7469 - 2017-09-20
of the circuit court for Dane County: DIANE M. NICKS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7469 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36243 - 2014-09-15
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36243 - 2014-09-15
State v. La Rae J. Schell
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2009-02-19
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2009-02-19
[PDF]
Case of the month November 2009
measure read, in part, “that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/nov09.pdf - 2010-01-20
measure read, in part, “that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/nov09.pdf - 2010-01-20