Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 3410 for y's.
Search results 1811 - 1820 of 3410 for y's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[that] was consistent with the Y[-]STR profile developed from the standard of Shareff Childs.” She also found male
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839487 - 2024-08-20
[that] was consistent with the Y[-]STR profile developed from the standard of Shareff Childs.” She also found male
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839487 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
WI 16
2024AP000688-W Dan Schmidt v. Circuit Court of Winnebago County Denied 3/13/2025 2024AP000710 State v. D. Y
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951433 - 2025-05-22
2024AP000688-W Dan Schmidt v. Circuit Court of Winnebago County Denied 3/13/2025 2024AP000710 State v. D. Y
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951433 - 2025-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
being drawn and responded “[y]es” to the question of whether he “observe[d the] phlebotomist collect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052406 - 2025-12-18
being drawn and responded “[y]es” to the question of whether he “observe[d the] phlebotomist collect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052406 - 2025-12-18
[PDF]
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
Caulfield v. Caulfield, 183 Wis.2d 83, 93, 515 N.W.2d 278, 283 (Ct. App. 1994) (“[B]y failing to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11864 - 2017-09-21
Caulfield v. Caulfield, 183 Wis.2d 83, 93, 515 N.W.2d 278, 283 (Ct. App. 1994) (“[B]y failing to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
so she had that taking. So, they didn’t have no (DNA) so the[y] planted it there?” The missing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143093 - 2017-09-21
so she had that taking. So, they didn’t have no (DNA) so the[y] planted it there?” The missing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143093 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randall J. Gibas
if it could not reach a verdict. Koenig's response, according to Judge Grimm's recollection, was, “[‘Y]ou
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9409 - 2005-03-31
if it could not reach a verdict. Koenig's response, according to Judge Grimm's recollection, was, “[‘Y]ou
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Warren
, are you?” Warren answered, “[n]o sir,” and the prosecutor followed with, “[y]ou’re a career criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14149 - 2014-09-15
, are you?” Warren answered, “[n]o sir,” and the prosecutor followed with, “[y]ou’re a career criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14149 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory M. Sanders
that the objects sought are linked with the commission of a crime, and that the[y] … will be found in the place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13814 - 2005-03-31
that the objects sought are linked with the commission of a crime, and that the[y] … will be found in the place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
940.31(1)(b), STATS., makes guilty of a Class B felony a person who "[b]y force or threat of imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8994 - 2017-09-19
940.31(1)(b), STATS., makes guilty of a Class B felony a person who "[b]y force or threat of imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8994 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Awe claims that his accountant would have testified as to the “generally health[y] financial situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
Awe claims that his accountant would have testified as to the “generally health[y] financial situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03