Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18101 - 18110 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
Search results 18101 - 18110 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 676, 747 N.W.2d 673, 678. We consider questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24
, 676, 747 N.W.2d 673, 678. We consider questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
violated on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26536 - 2017-09-21
violated on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶14 We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44424 - 2014-09-15
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶14 We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44424 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
concluded that the absence of a cover page on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
concluded that the absence of a cover page on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Certification
this court would give deference, or a conclusion of law to be reviewed de novo? As applied in the Hager
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160618 - 2017-09-21
this court would give deference, or a conclusion of law to be reviewed de novo? As applied in the Hager
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160618 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and punitive damages of $9,000. Elroy appeals. Discussion ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23
and punitive damages of $9,000. Elroy appeals. Discussion ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552162 - 2022-08-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552162 - 2022-08-10
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Jackson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15466 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15466 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 671, 407 N.W. 2d 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23
of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 671, 407 N.W. 2d 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23