Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18101 - 18110 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 18101 - 18110 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Gaultney
him was insufficient and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25458 - 2017-09-21
him was insufficient and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25458 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael R. Gaultney
was insufficient and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25458 - 2006-06-13
was insufficient and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25458 - 2006-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Carl Mitchell
, party to a crime, in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.05, STATS. The trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9744 - 2017-09-19
, party to a crime, in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.05, STATS. The trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9744 - 2017-09-19
State v. David W. Hoppe
that the only evidence presented at the preliminary examination was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
that the only evidence presented at the preliminary examination was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Beyan K. Stanley
. Based on the officers’ testimony, which the trial court found credible, the searching officers could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13935 - 2014-09-15
. Based on the officers’ testimony, which the trial court found credible, the searching officers could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13935 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3722 - 2005-03-31
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3722 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn R. Coleman
the owner's consent (OMVWOC), recklessly endangering safety, and two burglaries. The trial court imposed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8678 - 2005-03-31
the owner's consent (OMVWOC), recklessly endangering safety, and two burglaries. The trial court imposed two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8678 - 2005-03-31
Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
with Levin. ¶3 Radtke first argues that, in stating its decision, the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
with Levin. ¶3 Radtke first argues that, in stating its decision, the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
State v. William J. Perry
agreement by informing the trial court of an additional conviction, altering the sentencing matrix score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9732 - 2005-03-31
agreement by informing the trial court of an additional conviction, altering the sentencing matrix score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9732 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
while an overnight guest in their residence. During the trial, and over Goff’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
while an overnight guest in their residence. During the trial, and over Goff’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31