Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18101 - 18110 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the charges for trial and in denying his request to represent himself at trial. We reject Boyd’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639738 - 2023-03-30

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Gaultney
him was insufficient and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25458 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael R. Gaultney
was insufficient and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25458 - 2006-06-12

[PDF] State v. Beyan K. Stanley
. Based on the officers’ testimony, which the trial court found credible, the searching officers could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13935 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3722 - 2005-03-31

State v. William J. Perry
agreement by informing the trial court of an additional conviction, altering the sentencing matrix score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9732 - 2005-03-31

State v. David W. Hendricks
. On appeal, Hendricks contends that the trial court erroneously limited his cross-examination in two regards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8311 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Perez was provided a copy of the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752010 - 2024-01-19

State v. Dale L. Smith
postconviction motion. Smith contends that the trial court erred in refusing to strike for cause a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7608 - 2005-03-31

State v. Cheryl Braun
. SCHUDSON, J.[1] Cheryl Braun appeals from the trial court order affirming the decision of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8823 - 2005-03-31