Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18101 - 18110 of 58312 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Kari L. Sparish v. Richard P. Sparish
Kaitchuck. The trial court found that Sparish violated a stipulation and order that he refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15698 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Perez was provided a copy of the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752010 - 2024-01-19

Childeric Maxy v. Julia Meyer
referred to mediation but could not reach an agreement. A trial was scheduled for September 5, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3506 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2 trial counsel was ineffective by not presenting expert testimony and other evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06

Christine A. Blackstone v. Thomas A. Blackstone
for three years and to contribute $500 toward her attorney fees and costs. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9969 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3724 - 2005-03-31

Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
with Levin. ΒΆ3 Radtke first argues that, in stating its decision, the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
in these three consolidated appeals is whether the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3723 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dale L. Smith
postconviction motion. Smith contends that the trial court erred in refusing to strike for cause a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7608 - 2005-03-31

State v. David W. Hendricks
. On appeal, Hendricks contends that the trial court erroneously limited his cross-examination in two regards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8311 - 2005-03-31