Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18111 - 18120 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
Search results 18111 - 18120 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197671 - 2017-10-20
are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197671 - 2017-10-20
State v. Craig D. Warren
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We decide de novo, however, the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17639 - 2005-04-13
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We decide de novo, however, the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17639 - 2005-04-13
[PDF]
WI App 19
under the clearly erroneous standard while the court’s finding of constitutionality is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183522 - 2018-02-13
under the clearly erroneous standard while the court’s finding of constitutionality is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183522 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
WI App 140 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2660 Complete Title...
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71497 - 2011-10-18
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71497 - 2011-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
weight, or de novo. American Mfrs., 252 Wis. 2d 155, ¶11. We accord “great weight” deference here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177596 - 2017-09-21
weight, or de novo. American Mfrs., 252 Wis. 2d 155, ¶11. We accord “great weight” deference here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177596 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven P. Berth
was ineffective is one of law which we will decide de novo. See id. at 607, 369 N.W.2d at 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13843 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective is one of law which we will decide de novo. See id. at 607, 369 N.W.2d at 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deny the claim without a hearing. Ibid. We review de novo whether a defendant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82109 - 2014-09-15
deny the claim without a hearing. Ibid. We review de novo whether a defendant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82109 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
and after a de novo review conclude that misconduct occurred. We cannot do this because the present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16552 - 2005-03-31
and after a de novo review conclude that misconduct occurred. We cannot do this because the present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16552 - 2005-03-31