Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 98614 for civil court case status online.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 98614 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Johnson
“was wise in bringing [the sentence status] before the Court” and conclude that the matter was brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8844 - 2017-09-19
“was wise in bringing [the sentence status] before the Court” and conclude that the matter was brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8844 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald J. Johnson
that “[t]hat case was remitted on April 27, 1994.” In addition, the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8844 - 2005-03-31
that “[t]hat case was remitted on April 27, 1994.” In addition, the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8844 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin E. Murley
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED September 20, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED September 20, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8881 - 2005-03-31
Michael Leban v. Sun Patio, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE April 15, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12463 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE April 15, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin E. Murley
by Murley's conduct in this case. As such, we are compelled to affirm the trial court's ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8881 - 2017-09-19
by Murley's conduct in this case. As such, we are compelled to affirm the trial court's ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8881 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
included the following: THE COURT: All right. Let’s go through the facts in each of these cases very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2788 - 2017-09-19
included the following: THE COURT: All right. Let’s go through the facts in each of these cases very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2788 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating the court’s oral pronouncement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18320 - 2005-05-24
not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating the court’s oral pronouncement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18320 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
. Accordingly, we reversed and remanded. ¶5 On remand the circuit court set the case for jury trial. Pease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
. Accordingly, we reversed and remanded. ¶5 On remand the circuit court set the case for jury trial. Pease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
Certification
call for a more explicit explanation of the status of the law from the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In sum
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29212 - 2007-05-30
call for a more explicit explanation of the status of the law from the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In sum
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29212 - 2007-05-30
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP2695 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV233
explicit explanation of the status of the law from the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In sum, we see several
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29212 - 2014-09-15
explicit explanation of the status of the law from the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In sum, we see several
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29212 - 2014-09-15