Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 30143 for de.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 30143 for de.
[PDF]
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Crowe, 189 Wis.2d 72, 76, 525 N.W.2d 291, 293 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19
a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Crowe, 189 Wis.2d 72, 76, 525 N.W.2d 291, 293 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
contends that the trial court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
contends that the trial court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerold A. Haut
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
.” State v. Phillips, 2009 WI App 179, ¶17, 322 Wis. 2d 576, 778 N.W.2d 157. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). “Whether a party has met its burden of proof is a question of law” reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792650 - 2024-04-25
(1980). “Whether a party has met its burden of proof is a question of law” reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792650 - 2024-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
Helen F. Losee v. Marine Bank
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18960 - 2005-08-30
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18960 - 2005-08-30
State v. John S.
Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7369 - 2005-03-31
Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7369 - 2005-03-31
Smith and Spidahl Enterprises, Inc. v. Mark H. Lee
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10610 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10610 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
” and therefore is de novo. ¶5 Maringer is mistaken regarding our standard of review. Although the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127980 - 2014-11-18
” and therefore is de novo. ¶5 Maringer is mistaken regarding our standard of review. Although the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127980 - 2014-11-18