Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 24584 for extending.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 24584 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Russo
and six months in prison followed by nine years and six months of extended supervision. Russo appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6281 - 2017-09-19
and six months in prison followed by nine years and six months of extended supervision. Russo appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Calvin R. Herzog
. United States, 541 U.S. 615 (2004). There, the Court extended the rule of Belton to apply even when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25607 - 2017-09-21
. United States, 541 U.S. 615 (2004). There, the Court extended the rule of Belton to apply even when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 62
of appeals on July 1, 2021. The court intends to extend these procedures to the supreme court as soon
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542164 - 2022-07-07
of appeals on July 1, 2021. The court intends to extend these procedures to the supreme court as soon
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542164 - 2022-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1992) (extending the Strickland requirement to TPR cases). To prove ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74541 - 2014-09-15
(1992) (extending the Strickland requirement to TPR cases). To prove ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74541 - 2014-09-15
Donald J. Kurylo v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. On November 6, 1997, WepCo made its first jurisdictional offer of $17,800 to the Kurylos. WepCo extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15551 - 2005-03-31
. On November 6, 1997, WepCo made its first jurisdictional offer of $17,800 to the Kurylos. WepCo extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15551 - 2005-03-31
Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
in the judgment had expired long ago and the judgment made no mention of extending the redemption period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
in the judgment had expired long ago and the judgment made no mention of extending the redemption period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
State v. Xavier B. Smith
of extended supervision. Smith moved for postconviction relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21024 - 2006-01-23
of extended supervision. Smith moved for postconviction relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21024 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
confinement and eighteen years’ extended supervision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION A. Claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33551 - 2014-09-15
confinement and eighteen years’ extended supervision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION A. Claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33551 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, bifurcated as five years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision. ¶5 Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
, bifurcated as five years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision. ¶5 Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
Malaikham Bounpraseuth v. David Lewis
were not able to agree as to placement issues. At this hearing, Lewis’s placement was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21713 - 2006-03-13
were not able to agree as to placement issues. At this hearing, Lewis’s placement was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21713 - 2006-03-13