Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.

County of Jefferson v. John H. Newkirk
a valid investigatory stop consistent with the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2142 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in limine. We address each in turn. Sufficiency of the Evidence ¶9 Courts must search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43086 - 2009-11-04

[PDF] Parkview of Caledonia, LLC v. Joseph Weisto
, § ATCP 134.06(4). The trial court’s ruling in this case is consistent with both the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6076 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
assigned to the case and Kurt all testified. The trial court ordered that the CHIPS order be extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5084 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joseph Wrecza v. Harold A. Patino
as it fully and fairly informs the jury of the rules and principles of law applicable to the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14703 - 2017-09-21

Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
of the testimony. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). Appellate courts search the record for evidence to support findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2669 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argued his case should have been dismissed because the preliminary hearing was not held within ten days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822815 - 2024-07-10

Joseph Wrecza v. Harold A. Patino
of the rules and principles of law applicable to the particular case. See Nowatske v. Osterloh, 198 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14703 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, to stay the appeal and remand the case to the circuit court for him to file an amended motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596782 - 2022-12-06

Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
to the case and Kurt all testified. The trial court ordered that the CHIPS order be extended for one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5084 - 2005-03-31