Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Kari L. Sparish v. Richard P. Sparish
Kaitchuck. The trial court found that Sparish violated a stipulation and order that he refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15698 - 2017-09-21
Kaitchuck. The trial court found that Sparish violated a stipulation and order that he refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15698 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry W. Echols
factor” not known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing, which justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24799 - 2006-04-17
factor” not known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing, which justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24799 - 2006-04-17
Kari L. Sparish v. Richard P. Sparish
. The trial court found that Sparish violated a stipulation and order that he refrain from drinking while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15698 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court found that Sparish violated a stipulation and order that he refrain from drinking while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald L. Saari
paraphernalia, § 161.573(1), STATS.1 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12227 - 2014-09-15
paraphernalia, § 161.573(1), STATS.1 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12227 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was coerced into accepting the plea because his trial counsel refused to pursue a particular legal argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42750 - 2009-10-28
was coerced into accepting the plea because his trial counsel refused to pursue a particular legal argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42750 - 2009-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Demitrus L. Mayweather
of conviction. The no merit report addresses: (1) whether trial counsel’s assistance was ineffective; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12612 - 2017-09-21
of conviction. The no merit report addresses: (1) whether trial counsel’s assistance was ineffective; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry W. Echols
of “intent to kill” presents a “new factor” not known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24799 - 2017-09-21
of “intent to kill” presents a “new factor” not known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 Rogers argues that: (1) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
).1 Rogers argues that: (1) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
the trial court denied an untimely suppression motion. The issue is whether he received effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17824 - 2017-09-21
the trial court denied an untimely suppression motion. The issue is whether he received effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17824 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
. Stat. ch. 980 commitment. He argues that the trial court deprived him of a full and fair hearing when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. ch. 980 commitment. He argues that the trial court deprived him of a full and fair hearing when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31