Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 18121 - 18130 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 Rogers argues that: (1) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
).1 Rogers argues that: (1) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Larry W. Echols
of “intent to kill” presents a “new factor” not known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24799 - 2017-09-21
of “intent to kill” presents a “new factor” not known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24799 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
postconviction counsel was ineffective in not pursuing certain claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91266 - 2013-01-02
postconviction counsel was ineffective in not pursuing certain claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91266 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Ronald L. Saari
paraphernalia, § 161.573(1), STATS.1 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12227 - 2014-09-15
paraphernalia, § 161.573(1), STATS.1 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12227 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the petition without a trial, but we reversed that order on appeal. On remand, the circuit court held a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390390 - 2021-07-15
the petition without a trial, but we reversed that order on appeal. On remand, the circuit court held a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390390 - 2021-07-15
State v. Peter T. Nelson
pursuant to a plea agreement.[1] The trial court sentenced Nelson to five years in prison for second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8771 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to a plea agreement.[1] The trial court sentenced Nelson to five years in prison for second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8771 - 2005-03-31
Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
with Levin. ¶3 Radtke first argues that, in stating its decision, the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
with Levin. ¶3 Radtke first argues that, in stating its decision, the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
State v. Corey O. Mackin
that the only evidence presented at the preliminary examination was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
that the only evidence presented at the preliminary examination was inadmissible. Because we conclude the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
motion to withdraw his guilty plea and rejecting his claim of ineffective trial No(s). 98-0055-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13499 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw his guilty plea and rejecting his claim of ineffective trial No(s). 98-0055-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98006 - 2014-09-15
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98006 - 2014-09-15