Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
an order denying his postconviction motion. Dantzler claims that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20
an order denying his postconviction motion. Dantzler claims that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20
State v. Linda R. Cauley
court's findings of fact relevant to the merits of their claims are not clearly erroneous, the Cauleys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2005-03-31
court's findings of fact relevant to the merits of their claims are not clearly erroneous, the Cauleys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In the motion, Gregory claimed that his appointed appellate counsel was ineffective. This court construed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30041 - 2014-09-15
. In the motion, Gregory claimed that his appointed appellate counsel was ineffective. This court construed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30041 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an interlocutory determination that the plaintiffs had stated a claim. However, North Central settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97054 - 2014-09-15
an interlocutory determination that the plaintiffs had stated a claim. However, North Central settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97054 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel had been ineffective because, although he had raised ineffective-assistance claims against trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123024 - 2014-10-06
counsel had been ineffective because, although he had raised ineffective-assistance claims against trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123024 - 2014-10-06
2007 WI APP 224
on double jeopardy and claim and issue preclusion grounds.[1] Nommensen contends that this prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30317 - 2007-10-30
on double jeopardy and claim and issue preclusion grounds.[1] Nommensen contends that this prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30317 - 2007-10-30
Jeffrey A. Weisman v. The Town of Minocqua
., the "notice of claim" statute, and (5) granted the Town immunity from suit. We reject these arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14441 - 2005-03-31
., the "notice of claim" statute, and (5) granted the Town immunity from suit. We reject these arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven R. Calhoun
. Calhoun claims that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay testimony concerning the results of DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12199 - 2017-09-21
. Calhoun claims that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay testimony concerning the results of DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12199 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective because, although he had raised ineffective-assistance claims against trial counsel, they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123024 - 2014-10-07
ineffective because, although he had raised ineffective-assistance claims against trial counsel, they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123024 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing. London also argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88603 - 2012-10-22
a hearing. London also argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88603 - 2012-10-22