Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 62000 for child support.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 62000 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
reports were insufficient to support either the allegation that Smith was involved in disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
reports were insufficient to support either the allegation that Smith was involved in disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
State v. Carlos Perez
The State cites State v. Williams, 148 Wis. 2d 852, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1989), as support for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16254 - 2005-03-31
The State cites State v. Williams, 148 Wis. 2d 852, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1989), as support for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reports were insufficient to support either the allegation that Smith was involved in disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
reports were insufficient to support either the allegation that Smith was involved in disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lealon R. Knecht
child support obligations. The court found that Knecht had no intention of changing his behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10338 - 2017-09-20
child support obligations. The court found that Knecht had no intention of changing his behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10338 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interlock; and two years of probation. Defense counsel argued in support of the joint recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22
interlock; and two years of probation. Defense counsel argued in support of the joint recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
)). An appellate court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding the [fact finder’s] decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22
)). An appellate court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding the [fact finder’s] decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding the [fact finder’s] decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103159 - 2017-09-21
court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding the [fact finder’s] decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103159 - 2017-09-21
State v. Juan M. Navarro
. Navarro’s counsel asserted in a brief supporting the motion that “at trial [Navarro] will assert that as he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2417 - 2005-03-31
. Navarro’s counsel asserted in a brief supporting the motion that “at trial [Navarro] will assert that as he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2417 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
threshold merely because a child, at his request, advised the adults that the police wished to speak to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07
threshold merely because a child, at his request, advised the adults that the police wished to speak to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Perez
¶5 The State cites State v. Williams, 148 Wis. 2d 852, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1989), as support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16254 - 2017-09-21
¶5 The State cites State v. Williams, 148 Wis. 2d 852, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1989), as support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16254 - 2017-09-21