Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 69114 for he.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Anderson
. on a May evening. He observed nothing unusual or illegal in Anderson’s operation of the boat. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
. on a May evening. He observed nothing unusual or illegal in Anderson’s operation of the boat. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas A. Edmonston
exercise of its sentencing discretion. He contends that the court misused its discretion because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15798 - 2009-08-02
exercise of its sentencing discretion. He contends that the court misused its discretion because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15798 - 2009-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to additional sentence credit; however, we conclude that it is for a shorter period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
that he is entitled to additional sentence credit; however, we conclude that it is for a shorter period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues: (1) his conviction was obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues: (1) his conviction was obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gary C. Sukowatey v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
. He also argues that its decision was arbitrary, unreasonable, oppressive and capricious. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15759 - 2017-09-21
. He also argues that its decision was arbitrary, unreasonable, oppressive and capricious. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15759 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of conditional jail time that he received in his original sentence should be applied to Counts 3 and 6 under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66393 - 2011-06-22
of conditional jail time that he received in his original sentence should be applied to Counts 3 and 6 under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66393 - 2011-06-22
Barbara Ellis v. City of Reedsburg
to talk to you and get down to the bottom of this bullshit." He further told her, "You can beg 'til
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8099 - 2005-03-31
to talk to you and get down to the bottom of this bullshit." He further told her, "You can beg 'til
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals pro se from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005-06) postconviction motion in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29629 - 2014-09-15
appeals pro se from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005-06) postconviction motion in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29629 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leon S. Groeschl
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15255 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182012 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182012 - 2017-09-21