Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 64977 for or b.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 64977 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
is not subject to motor vehicle registration and is: (a) used for the service of the insured residence; (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28587 - 2012-02-01
is not subject to motor vehicle registration and is: (a) used for the service of the insured residence; (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28587 - 2012-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. By its terms, the definition of operating in WIS. STAT. § 346.63(3)(b) is not restricted to a running
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463882 - 2021-12-22
. By its terms, the definition of operating in WIS. STAT. § 346.63(3)(b) is not restricted to a running
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463882 - 2021-12-22
State v. Michael J. G.
include “[i]ntentional penile ejaculation,” see § 948.01(5)(b), Stats., 1995-96, the statute applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12753 - 2005-03-31
include “[i]ntentional penile ejaculation,” see § 948.01(5)(b), Stats., 1995-96, the statute applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12753 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(possession of child pornography)—which are the counts of conviction here. See § 939.615(1)(b)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343855 - 2021-03-09
(possession of child pornography)—which are the counts of conviction here. See § 939.615(1)(b)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343855 - 2021-03-09
State v. Derek L. Naff
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). Naff contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). Naff contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
State v. Conrad Hagenkord
the underlying bases for his ultimate opinion. B. Insufficient Evidence. Hagenkord next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12256 - 2005-03-31
the underlying bases for his ultimate opinion. B. Insufficient Evidence. Hagenkord next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12256 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger M. Spencer
)(a) and for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) in violation of § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2483 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) in violation of § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2483 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ashley S.
. § 972.11(2)(b), as well as an alternate explanation for what the defense anticipated would be the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15729 - 2005-03-31
. § 972.11(2)(b), as well as an alternate explanation for what the defense anticipated would be the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15729 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gregg B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gregg B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
CA Blank Order
at sentencing under Wis. Stat. § 973.049(2). See Wis. Stat. §§ 941.39(1), 939.62(1)(b). Thomas disputed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145379 - 2015-07-27
at sentencing under Wis. Stat. § 973.049(2). See Wis. Stat. §§ 941.39(1), 939.62(1)(b). Thomas disputed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145379 - 2015-07-27