Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 50070 for our.

[PDF] State v. Gary Mahlum
. No. 98-2398-CR 5 FELON IN POSSESSION COUNTS We confine our analysis to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14403 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 3
court upon remand do not negate the plain language of the Juvenile Code or the guidance of our case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105741 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Wells Oswalt
imposed here. NO. 96-1252-CR 4 Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10769 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
to his position in the present case. However, Spangler contends our analysis was “fatally flawed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44959 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jermaine Jones
issue for our consideration: whether the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
from asserting any deficiencies in the claim. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255575 - 2020-02-28

CA Blank Order
would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132754 - 2015-01-06

[PDF] State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
to our discussions and need not be set forth in this opinion. Nos. 99-1107-CR 99-1108-CR 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to enter his plea. Upon our independent review of the record and counsel’s no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189050 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
stated, “[w]e need finality in our litigation.” Id., ¶27 (quoting Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24