Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18131 - 18140 of 20860 for word.

Jane A. Sellers v. Kelly D. Sellers
] By using the word "marital estate," we mean property subject to division under § 767.255, Stats. [3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9766 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
might have meant by its use of the word “understanding.” [5] See footnote 3. [6] See footnote 3.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104757 - 2013-11-25

COURT OF APPEALS
building. Sec. 101.11(2). In other words, the Safe Place Statute “requires a place of employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29550 - 2007-07-02

[PDF] William Poluk v. J.N. Manson Agency, Inc.
of the vacancy, not mentioning the building was for sale, and not using the words tenant and vacant. Pagel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4969 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas Gritzner v. Michael R.
reject this argument. 4 The word “protect” in § 324A is a typographical error. It should read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13590 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark R. Johnson
that word in the popular sense.” Rash, 260 Wis. 2d 369, ¶7 (citation omitted). This means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19351 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a carefully worded instruction on eyewitness identification generally: The identification of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65045 - 2014-09-15

State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
or she had no such alternative; in other words, the defendant did not have a chance to refuse to possess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31

Larry Buyatt v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
that renders a word or phrase superfluous must be avoided). The natural conclusion, they contend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6905 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tyren E. Black
, or reasonably believed that he or she had no such alternative; in other words, the defendant did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15046 - 2005-03-31