Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18141 - 18150 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18141 - 18150 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
made by Gerard. Gerard claims: (1) the trial court should not have granted the protective order; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02
made by Gerard. Gerard claims: (1) the trial court should not have granted the protective order; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Pralle
, without a hearing, holding that Pralle could have raised his claims in his response to the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20691 - 2017-09-21
, without a hearing, holding that Pralle could have raised his claims in his response to the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20691 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm the circuit court’s judgment. No. 2015AP198 2 ¶2 Daniels claimed that his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169101 - 2017-09-21
affirm the circuit court’s judgment. No. 2015AP198 2 ¶2 Daniels claimed that his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169101 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
inadequately advised him of the advantages of the State’s plea offer. He also claimed that postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131977 - 2014-12-22
inadequately advised him of the advantages of the State’s plea offer. He also claimed that postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131977 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. John E.
to assume parental responsibility. John claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15853 - 2017-09-21
to assume parental responsibility. John claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 Rogers’s claims are procedurally barred, and therefore we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 Rogers’s claims are procedurally barred, and therefore we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
, 1993, when he claims he was illegally placed on parole. Luedtke cannot prevail on his mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
, 1993, when he claims he was illegally placed on parole. Luedtke cannot prevail on his mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randy L. Pralle
that Pralle could have raised his claims in his response to the no-merit report. Because Pralle did not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20691 - 2005-12-19
that Pralle could have raised his claims in his response to the no-merit report. Because Pralle did not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20691 - 2005-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
” Slocum’s claims, a requirement of a final order or judgment. See Wambolt v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
” Slocum’s claims, a requirement of a final order or judgment. See Wambolt v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17