Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18151 - 18160 of 68275 for did.
Search results 18151 - 18160 of 68275 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
this provision. The court determined that the phrase “subject to review” did not mean, as Link contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31262 - 2014-09-15
this provision. The court determined that the phrase “subject to review” did not mean, as Link contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31262 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in the proceedings, and even if it did, the filing of the motion to dismiss preserved the issue, the City did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
in the proceedings, and even if it did, the filing of the motion to dismiss preserved the issue, the City did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
officer did not administer standardized field sobriety tests, a preliminary breath test (PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37755 - 2014-09-15
officer did not administer standardized field sobriety tests, a preliminary breath test (PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Victor J. Fischer v. Deborah J. Fischer
Victor’s relationship with the children and that Victor did not abuse the children are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12756 - 2017-09-21
Victor’s relationship with the children and that Victor did not abuse the children are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12756 - 2017-09-21
Johnson Bank v. Brandon Apparel Group, Inc.
” if it decided otherwise. ¶5 The court granted the motion for default judgment. The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3164 - 2005-03-31
” if it decided otherwise. ¶5 The court granted the motion for default judgment. The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3164 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
protections and thus could not constitute disorderly conduct; (2) he did not send a message to another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26
protections and thus could not constitute disorderly conduct; (2) he did not send a message to another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, however, “until it actually came out and was on the hood of the [squad] vehicle.” ¶6 Hines did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28229 - 2007-02-26
, however, “until it actually came out and was on the hood of the [squad] vehicle.” ¶6 Hines did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28229 - 2007-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, instead arguing that Rebedew did not have probable cause because there was no proof that Schroth had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415846 - 2021-08-25
, instead arguing that Rebedew did not have probable cause because there was no proof that Schroth had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415846 - 2021-08-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING: ZIEGLER, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104868 - 2017-09-21
: JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: NOT PARTICIPATING: ZIEGLER, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104868 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
some officers had body cameras while others did not. The officer testified that he was not aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004100 - 2025-09-03
some officers had body cameras while others did not. The officer testified that he was not aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004100 - 2025-09-03