Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18161 - 18170 of 29823 for des.

Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
. We review summary judgments de novo by applying the same criteria as the trial court. Universal Die
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10628 - 2005-03-31

Smith and Spidahl Enterprises, Inc. v. Mark H. Lee
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10610 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶13 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 939.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467052 - 2021-12-28

[PDF] Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
(1991). How to interpret the section presents a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14066 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶14 We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44424 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
. Summary judgment presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14778 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
to change or set aside the verdict, we review its decision de novo. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7384 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Whether a stop and seizure is constitutional is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Pugh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220597 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] State v. Lee Raven
. ¶7 The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15650 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP1011-FT 5 facts meet the statutory requirements is a question of law we review de novo. K.N.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119266 - 2014-09-15