Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18161 - 18170 of 69114 for he.

COURT OF APPEALS
. Anderson related the following facts. On January 7, 2011, while Anderson was on duty, he received notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102214 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
material. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91084 - 2012-12-03

COURT OF APPEALS
Yandel testified at the suppression hearing that he was on patrol at 2:05 a.m. on October 19, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2010-09-07

COURT OF APPEALS
that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice because the real controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49527 - 2010-05-04

COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction for operating under the influence of a controlled substance, third offense. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44984 - 2009-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS
supervision. ¶4 Because Lindblom was due 599 days’ sentence credit, he was placed on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127589 - 2014-11-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
interviewed Carroll again, and Carroll admitted that he planned to sell the heroin and that he had possessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206797 - 2018-01-17

Jennifer Louise Kunert v. Lyle Herman Kunert
a gun on me," and in the struggle to get the gun away from her, he pushed her through a wall.[3] Lyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11604 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 78
sexual assault of a child.1 Thomas asks us to overturn his convictions because he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15

State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
husband and Mark Krumplitsch’s brother-in-law, testified that he observed Krumplitsch and Porth burning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31