Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18161 - 18170 of 49833 for our.
Search results 18161 - 18170 of 49833 for our.
[PDF]
NOTICE
consecutive days in jail. For purposes of our analysis, we assume that this is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31684 - 2014-09-15
consecutive days in jail. For purposes of our analysis, we assume that this is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31684 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a new sentence. With regard to Moore’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
for a new sentence. With regard to Moore’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
State v. Bruce H. Mallow
N.W.2d 225 (1979). Our inquiry is limited to asking “whether appropriate discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16303 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 225 (1979). Our inquiry is limited to asking “whether appropriate discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16303 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ivan C. Mitchell
is whether our confidence in the outcome is sufficiently undermined. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21487 - 2006-02-21
is whether our confidence in the outcome is sufficiently undermined. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21487 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
Robert Skenandore v. Michael J. Sullivan
. To the best of our ability, we deem the following to be the basis for this appeal: (1) whether Skenandore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14888 - 2017-09-21
. To the best of our ability, we deem the following to be the basis for this appeal: (1) whether Skenandore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14888 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence sustains them, and we may not substitute our discretion for that of the Board’s, as committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence sustains them, and we may not substitute our discretion for that of the Board’s, as committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darrel W. Howsden
. Jankee testified that he observed Howsden armed with a shotgun and yelled to him, "Don't shoot our dogs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9479 - 2005-03-31
. Jankee testified that he observed Howsden armed with a shotgun and yelled to him, "Don't shoot our dogs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James H.
from the percentage standard. ¶7 From our reading of James’s briefs, we deem that there are two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
from the percentage standard. ¶7 From our reading of James’s briefs, we deem that there are two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
’ property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114855 - 2014-06-16
’ property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114855 - 2014-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact and conclusions of No. 2022AP1024 2 law. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
findings of fact and conclusions of No. 2022AP1024 2 law. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09