Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18171 - 18180 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18171 - 18180 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Eric E. Rice v. Gerald Sielaff, M.D.
that Rice’s estate[1] failed to comply with the notice-of-claim statute, Wis. Stat. § 893.82(5m) (1997-98).[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24661 - 2006-03-29
that Rice’s estate[1] failed to comply with the notice-of-claim statute, Wis. Stat. § 893.82(5m) (1997-98).[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24661 - 2006-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
] In the alternative, the Keeses claimed they obtained title by adverse possession pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 893.26.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96809 - 2013-05-13
] In the alternative, the Keeses claimed they obtained title by adverse possession pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 893.26.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96809 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed they obtained title by adverse possession pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 893.26.4 ¶6 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96809 - 2014-09-15
claimed they obtained title by adverse possession pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 893.26.4 ¶6 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96809 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
witnesses. He also claimed that his trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to request the 911 tape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26196 - 2006-08-14
witnesses. He also claimed that his trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to request the 911 tape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26196 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
summary judgment in favor of Maryland Casualty Company. Production Stamping claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14453 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment in favor of Maryland Casualty Company. Production Stamping claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William E. Conley
an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12922 - 2017-09-21
an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12922 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles R. Wincek
work. Wincek claims that the trial court erred in the amount of restitution ordered and that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
work. Wincek claims that the trial court erred in the amount of restitution ordered and that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Nathaniel A. Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
, we asked the respondents to address Lindell’s claims, and allowed Lindell to reply. Having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5285 - 2017-09-19
, we asked the respondents to address Lindell’s claims, and allowed Lindell to reply. Having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5285 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher Walker
Walker claims that he received ineffective assistance, that the evidence does not support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
Walker claims that he received ineffective assistance, that the evidence does not support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Sweat
to the victims from the total amount of restitution ordered by the trial court; (2) the victims' claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
to the victims from the total amount of restitution ordered by the trial court; (2) the victims' claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31