Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18171 - 18180 of 29714 for des.
Search results 18171 - 18180 of 29714 for des.
Larry Gates v. Michael Dorshorst
de novo. State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis. 2d 553, 569, 494 N.W.2d 408 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5925 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis. 2d 553, 569, 494 N.W.2d 408 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Cole-Bey
a sufficient basis for the instruction presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Giminski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4637 - 2017-09-19
a sufficient basis for the instruction presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Giminski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4637 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Malcom, 2001 WI App 291, ¶12, 249 Wis. 2d 403, 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502282 - 2022-03-31
is a question of law that we determine de novo. State v. Malcom, 2001 WI App 291, ¶12, 249 Wis. 2d 403, 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502282 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerold A. Haut
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Fontaine L. Baker
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
State v. Norman R.
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in connection with whether Cheri V. was dangerous. Id., ¶5. We therefore reviewed the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236109 - 2019-02-26
in connection with whether Cheri V. was dangerous. Id., ¶5. We therefore reviewed the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236109 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether these findings satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207504 - 2018-01-23
. Whether these findings satisfy the statutory standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207504 - 2018-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
should be used in this instance. We accordingly direct the County to examine the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9453 - 2017-09-19
should be used in this instance. We accordingly direct the County to examine the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9453 - 2017-09-19