Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18171 - 18180 of 39849 for financial disclosure statements.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and killed him. ¶3 At trial, the State admitted into evidence an eight-page statement, created by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98380 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Leamon Hoover
for the jury to see him. We are concerned with defense counsel’s lack of candor in his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Danny E. Preuss
or did not offer before agreeing with a defense attorney’s statement of the agreement. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24569 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nathaniel Crampton
the commission of a crime.” The trial court then amplified on its second statement: In other words, if a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mildred R. Cermak v. Michael Swank, M.D.
statements from nine of the twelve jurors indicating that the jury did not find negligence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11662 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David M. Murrell
gave testimony which was inconsistent with his testimony at trial. DeNeal gave statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21

State v. David M. Murrell
at trial. DeNeal gave statements to the police after the shooting and to an investigator after trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 196.025(1)(ar), it did so incorrectly; and (4) the Commission’s Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859329 - 2024-10-09

[PDF] State v. Dean M. Nordall
occurred as opposed to the child’s prior inconsistent statement to a social worker detailing the abusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11219 - 2017-09-19

State v. Cameron D.
the future is not certain.” ¶6 Cameron seizes upon isolated statements by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24629 - 2006-03-27