Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18181 - 18190 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
to change or set aside the verdict, we review its decision de novo. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7384 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Whether a stop and seizure is constitutional is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Pugh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220597 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] State v. Lee Raven
. ¶7 The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15650 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP1011-FT 5 facts meet the statutory requirements is a question of law we review de novo. K.N.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119266 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2021AP1215-CR 2021AP1216-CR 5 de novo, without deference to the circuit court, but benefitting from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594255 - 2022-11-30

COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” State v. Doe, 2005 WI App 68, ¶5, 280 Wis. 2d 731, 697 N.W.2d 101. By contrast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79514 - 2012-03-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282446 - 2020-08-27

COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. ¶10 Counts has not shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21

James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31