Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18191 - 18200 of 64561 for b's.
Search results 18191 - 18200 of 64561 for b's.
CA Blank Order
upon his guilty pleas, on three counts of felony failure to support. Appellant counsel, Hannah B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
upon his guilty pleas, on three counts of felony failure to support. Appellant counsel, Hannah B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
Jennifer A. Croop v. Tom A. Sweeney
a continuity of purpose.” Section 947.013(1)(a) and (1m)(b). Single, isolated acts do not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15289 - 2005-03-31
a continuity of purpose.” Section 947.013(1)(a) and (1m)(b). Single, isolated acts do not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15289 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (acquittal shows jury was not prejudiced by improper information). B. Exclusion of Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10
) (acquittal shows jury was not prejudiced by improper information). B. Exclusion of Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10
State v. Antroy T. McGee
months. Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(b) (1999-2000). The sentence imposed was well within the maximum, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
months. Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(b) (1999-2000). The sentence imposed was well within the maximum, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
Spencer Hutchinson v. Robert Buckley
, caused by the failure ….” Wis. Stat. § 804.12(2)(b) (1999-2000).[1] The authority to impose sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3652 - 2005-03-31
, caused by the failure ….” Wis. Stat. § 804.12(2)(b) (1999-2000).[1] The authority to impose sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3652 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: Gregory B. Huber, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85474 - 2012-07-25
: Gregory B. Huber, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85474 - 2012-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(b); WIS. STAT. § 340.01(46m). Pertinent here, because Paul had three previous OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
. § 346.63(1)(b); WIS. STAT. § 340.01(46m). Pertinent here, because Paul had three previous OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of the violation, of the person and the victim of the violation. (b) The relationship between the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33732 - 2008-08-12
of the violation, of the person and the victim of the violation. (b) The relationship between the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33732 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 801.09(2)(a)3.b. (2009-10).[1] We therefore deem United Asian Services to have conceded that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79812 - 2012-03-21
. § 801.09(2)(a)3.b. (2009-10).[1] We therefore deem United Asian Services to have conceded that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79812 - 2012-03-21
Michael Kuborn v. Compcare Health Services Insurance Corporation
the agency was adjudicating a disputed issue of fact properly before it and b) whether the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5940 - 2005-03-31
the agency was adjudicating a disputed issue of fact properly before it and b) whether the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5940 - 2005-03-31