Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 82271 for case code.

[PDF] State v. Michael S., Jr.
code. ¶5 A determination of the issue presented in the instant case will have no practical effect
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18667 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For interpreters - How to get certified
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/services/interpreter/cert/orientation.htm - 2025-12-14

[PDF] Frederick N. Spence v. Marianne A. Cooke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2598 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14471 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
) to revoke Obriecht’s supervision in multiple criminal cases.[1] Obriecht contends that: (1) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
criminal cases. 1 Obriecht contends that: (1) he was denied due process at the revocation hearing; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118569 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2791-LV Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Comments from Christina J. Gilbert, Senior Youth Policy Counsel, The Gault Center, National Juvenile Defender Center
have been outstanding. We hear about 3,000 juvenile cases in my district. In only two cases did I deem
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23

[PDF] Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
2002 WI App 127 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4422 - 2017-09-19

Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
2002 WI App 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2595 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4422 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and security deposits have priority over the interests of the Bondholders. Facts ¶2 This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402815 - 2021-07-30