Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] Charles T. Wagner v. Madison Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120, ¶3, 244 Wis. 2d 280, ___, 628 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3272 - 2017-09-19

07AP2039 State v. John E. Gobis.doc
of law that we review de novo. “To the extent the circuit court’s decision involves findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04

Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
approval was illegal. Cramer appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5268 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sayoomporn Ostrum v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
injuries are scheduled rather than non-scheduled. Ostrum therefore argues for de novo review. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10466 - 2017-09-20

Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie
complaint, Anderson requested a trial de novo in the circuit court. See § 799.207(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2000 WI 75, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 137
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96946 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
if the County’s approval was illegal. Cramer appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5268 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
barred by Escalona-Naranjo is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802203 - 2024-05-16

State v. Gabreon J. Stone
of review with respect to these issues is de novo. See Manor v. Hanson, 123 Wis.2d 524, 533, 368 N.W.2d 41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9570 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991).[2] ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59738 - 2011-02-07