Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
Nancy Leibly v. Ronald P. Leibly
. Ronald filed a motion for de novo review in the trial court. Through counsel, Ronald agreed to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14509 - 2005-03-31
. Ronald filed a motion for de novo review in the trial court. Through counsel, Ronald agreed to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14509 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI APP 54
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61123 - 2011-05-08
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61123 - 2011-05-08
State v. Damon Roundtree
review de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 473 N.W.2d 164, 166 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10380 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 473 N.W.2d 164, 166 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10380 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59738 - 2014-09-15
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Randy Krueger
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11820 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11820 - 2017-09-21
10AP2672 State v. Matthew M. Gilbert.doc
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2010-09-05
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2010-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the injunction presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The dispute among the parties arises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238119 - 2019-03-27
the injunction presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. The dispute among the parties arises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238119 - 2019-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2022AP812-CR 3 defendant’s claims de novo. See State v. Lock, 2013 WI App 80, ¶12, 348 Wis. 2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714053 - 2023-10-12
. No. 2022AP812-CR 3 defendant’s claims de novo. See State v. Lock, 2013 WI App 80, ¶12, 348 Wis. 2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714053 - 2023-10-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
barred by Escalona-Naranjo is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802203 - 2024-05-16
barred by Escalona-Naranjo is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802203 - 2024-05-16