Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 2567 for dnr.

Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
to remediate a site in response to letters from the DNR. Additionally, we held that because the landowner had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9165 - 2005-03-31

Sokaogon Gaming Enterprise Corporation v. Lynn Danette Curda-Derickson
. Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99, 101 (Ct. App. 1994). Accordingly, for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5122 - 2005-03-31

Mark E. Hoppe v. Town of Porter Board of Adjustment
& Krause, Inc. v. DNR, 85 Wis.2d 198, 204, 270 N.W.2d 409, 413 (1978). And the substantial-evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13614 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 43
. DNR v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment, 170 Wis. 2d 406, 489 N.W.2d 631 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682977 - 2023-09-21

[PDF] Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
reply brief. We therefore take this as a concession. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3493 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
, however, we review the agency’s decision, not the trial court’s. See Sterlingworth Condo. Ass’n v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3053 - 2017-09-19

Bruce D. Golembiewski v. City of Milwaukee
subsequent judicial review. See Omernick v. DNR, 100 Wis.2d 234, 248, 301 N.W.2d 437, 444 (1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14380 - 2005-03-31

Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
not dispute that contention in his reply brief. We therefore take this as a concession. See Schlieper v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31

Superior Cranberry Creek Landfill Negotiating Committee v. State of Wisconsin
the operator to perform random truck inspections as required by the DNR. This item requires compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19341 - 2005-08-17

Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
, we review the agency’s decision, not the trial court’s. See Sterlingworth Condo. Ass’n v. DNR, 205
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31