Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 5959 for la.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 5959 for la.
COURT OF APPEALS
La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d 439, 446, 561 N.W.2d 686 (1997) (applying de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d 439, 446, 561 N.W.2d 686 (1997) (applying de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
WI 73
. For example, the Town of Campbell challenged the validity of its annexation by the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29435 - 2014-09-15
. For example, the Town of Campbell challenged the validity of its annexation by the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29435 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of review to a subsequent interpretation of the statute, citing La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
of review to a subsequent interpretation of the statute, citing La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. DOR, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
by the City of La Crosse on the basis that the annexed property was not contiguous with the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18
by the City of La Crosse on the basis that the annexed property was not contiguous with the City of La Crosse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-10
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
., Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: ramona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68709 - 2011-07-27
., Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: ramona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68709 - 2011-07-27
[PDF]
AP001700 CR State v. Jenifer A. Will
2019AP001258 FT La Crosse County v. J. M. A. 2019AP001483 State v. C. M. 2019AP001559 State v. E. F
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251618 - 2019-12-18
2019AP001258 FT La Crosse County v. J. M. A. 2019AP001483 State v. C. M. 2019AP001559 State v. E. F
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251618 - 2019-12-18
Cherie Prophett v. Equity Corporation International
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Bethke v. Lauderdale of La Crosse, Inc., 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2914 - 2005-03-31
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Bethke v. Lauderdale of La Crosse, Inc., 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2914 - 2005-03-31
Constance E. Bienemann v. State
of Wisconsin, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11945 - 2005-03-31
of Wisconsin, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11945 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for La Crosse County: DALE T. PASELL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64889 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for La Crosse County: DALE T. PASELL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64889 - 2014-09-15