Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 49813 for our.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 49813 for our.
State v. Donna E. Howard-Hastings
a “victim” under § 973.20(1r), Stats. Our conclusion is supported by the continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13132 - 2005-03-31
a “victim” under § 973.20(1r), Stats. Our conclusion is supported by the continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13132 - 2005-03-31
Robert Macemon v. Jessica Christie
in question. See Von Arx v. Schwarz, 185 Wis.2d 645, 655, 517 N.W.2d 540, 544 (Ct. App. 1994). Although our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
in question. See Von Arx v. Schwarz, 185 Wis.2d 645, 655, 517 N.W.2d 540, 544 (Ct. App. 1994). Although our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
and Schultz had exhausted her appeals, our opinion became the law of the case, precluding further review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6296 - 2017-09-19
and Schultz had exhausted her appeals, our opinion became the law of the case, precluding further review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6296 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134234 - 2017-09-21
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Sauk County Circuit Court case No. 2002CF186. Applying our supreme court’s recent decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668838 - 2023-06-15
in Sauk County Circuit Court case No. 2002CF186. Applying our supreme court’s recent decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668838 - 2023-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403075 - 2021-08-03
, and an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403075 - 2021-08-03
[PDF]
William Olson v. Sidney Kaprelian
Olson to forfeit a portion of his bond. We raise this question sua sponte in recognition of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9560 - 2017-09-19
Olson to forfeit a portion of his bond. We raise this question sua sponte in recognition of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9560 - 2017-09-19
State v. John T. Neita
and voluntarily. Upon our independent review of the plea questionnaire and the transcript of the plea hearing, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
and voluntarily. Upon our independent review of the plea questionnaire and the transcript of the plea hearing, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
no-merit report. Upon consideration of the reports, the response, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97900 - 2014-09-15
no-merit report. Upon consideration of the reports, the response, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97900 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI APP 39
) (2009-10). Here, the pertinent facts are undisputed, leaving only an issue of law for our consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60306 - 2011-03-29
) (2009-10). Here, the pertinent facts are undisputed, leaving only an issue of law for our consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60306 - 2011-03-29