Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault. No. 2018AP1053-CR 2 ¶2 Sills argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252313 - 2020-01-14
assault. No. 2018AP1053-CR 2 ¶2 Sills argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252313 - 2020-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Tommy L. Brown has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12
CURIAM. Tommy L. Brown has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12
State v. Rickey V. Gray
, and (4) battery to an officer. Gray contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5459 - 2005-03-31
, and (4) battery to an officer. Gray contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Deray J. Shaffale appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to void a voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252034 - 2020-01-16
. Deray J. Shaffale appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to void a voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252034 - 2020-01-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court was not impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92144 - 2014-09-15
argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court was not impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92144 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2019AP90-CR 2 ¶2 Savage argues that the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252642 - 2020-02-26
. No. 2019AP90-CR 2 ¶2 Savage argues that the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252642 - 2020-02-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever the trial from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05
for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever the trial from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05
COURT OF APPEALS
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied King’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70282 - 2011-08-30
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied King’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70282 - 2011-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of no contest. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
of no contest. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15