Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1821 - 1830 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied King’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70282 - 2011-08-30
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied King’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70282 - 2011-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of no contest. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
of no contest. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever the trial from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05
for a new trial. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever the trial from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and because of the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Fortes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
and because of the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Fortes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and because of the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Fortes was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
and because of the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Fortes was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135520 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion, in which he argued that trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
postconviction motion, in which he argued that trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41859 - 2009-10-05
sentence modification motion. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41859 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
misrepresentation of her income on a rent subsidy application. We conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31590 - 2014-09-15
misrepresentation of her income on a rent subsidy application. We conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31590 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and for intentional misrepresentation of her income on a rent subsidy application. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2008-01-22
and for intentional misrepresentation of her income on a rent subsidy application. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2008-01-22