Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18201 - 18210 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18201 - 18210 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Coopman v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30897 - 2007-11-20
State v. Clinton L. Duhm
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60761 - 2014-09-15
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60761 - 2014-09-15
County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
John D. Riley v. Ford Motor Company
of law requiring de novo review. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3222 - 2005-03-31
of law requiring de novo review. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3222 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Marks
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 704.27 counterclaim. “‘The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
. Stat. § 704.27 counterclaim. “‘The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20