Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18201 - 18210 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12

[PDF] State v. Rex B. Roberts
passes constitutional muster is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8149 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ryan J. Enea v. James G. Linn, M.D.
.” II. ¶11 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4495 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. As a general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85239 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Douglas W. Olen v. Frank K. Phelps
the matter de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7738 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a claim has arguable merit is a question of law reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Hansen v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760888 - 2024-02-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870564 - 2024-11-05

[PDF] L. W. Meyer, Inc. v. Robert Koeferl
which this court reviews de novo. Kaun v. Indus. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 667, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4693 - 2017-09-19

Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
of a statute and its application to a set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. Reyes v. Greatway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4413 - 2005-03-31