Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18211 - 18220 of 30143 for de.
Search results 18211 - 18220 of 30143 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
interpret § 343.303. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95705 - 2013-04-23
interpret § 343.303. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95705 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie K.
N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18646 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18646 - 2017-09-21
State v. William H. Roberts
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4088 - 2005-03-31
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4088 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard R. Yakes
court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance of those facts. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13646 - 2005-03-31
court’s factual findings, we review de novo the constitutional significance of those facts. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13646 - 2005-03-31
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis.2d 265, 272, 572 N.W.2d 519, 521 (Ct. App. 1997). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13625 - 2005-03-31
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Ora Jean Brown
judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4717 - 2005-03-31
judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4717 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P., 2003 WI App 232, ¶11, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48124 - 2010-03-17
of law that we review de novo. See Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P., 2003 WI App 232, ¶11, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48124 - 2010-03-17
Verlyn A. Schleusner v. William R. Lamb
is a question of law that we review de novo. Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d 439, 454, 471 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2667 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d 439, 454, 471 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91216 - 2014-09-15
judgment. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91216 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
review de novo. See Craig S.G. v. State, 209 Wis. 2d 65, 68, 561 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Craig S.G. v. State, 209 Wis. 2d 65, 68, 561 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31