Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18211 - 18220 of 29715 for des.
Search results 18211 - 18220 of 29715 for des.
[PDF]
Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
is de minimis, and does not constitute grounds for any sanction against the guardian. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8372 - 2017-09-19
is de minimis, and does not constitute grounds for any sanction against the guardian. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8372 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 49
is misdirected, and thus insufficient, is a question of law inviting our de novo review. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35568 - 2014-09-15
is misdirected, and thus insufficient, is a question of law inviting our de novo review. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251333 - 2019-12-13
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251333 - 2019-12-13
[PDF]
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
quotation marks omitted). Application of the harmless error test presents a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97597 - 2014-09-15
quotation marks omitted). Application of the harmless error test presents a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Nos. 2013AP2430-CR 2013AP2431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Nos. 2013AP2430-CR 2013AP2431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. James does not challenge that he is mentally ill and a proper subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460456 - 2021-12-07
review de novo. Id. James does not challenge that he is mentally ill and a proper subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460456 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-694 (1984). We review de novo whether a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375694 - 2021-06-10
v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-694 (1984). We review de novo whether a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375694 - 2021-06-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact that we review de novo as a question of law. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 204. ¶10 The right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
of constitutional fact that we review de novo as a question of law. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 204. ¶10 The right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24