Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18211 - 18220 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18211 - 18220 of 29942 for des.
Joseph P. Krause v. Myre Electric, Inc.
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law” that we decide de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
. “The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law” that we decide de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Certification
this court would give deference, or a conclusion of law to be reviewed de novo? As applied in the Hager
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160618 - 2017-09-21
this court would give deference, or a conclusion of law to be reviewed de novo? As applied in the Hager
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160618 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and punitive damages of $9,000. Elroy appeals. Discussion ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23
and punitive damages of $9,000. Elroy appeals. Discussion ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552162 - 2022-08-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552162 - 2022-08-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 7 ¶13 Even if not waived, Pablo’s contention lacks merit.3 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35641 - 2014-09-15
-CR 7 ¶13 Even if not waived, Pablo’s contention lacks merit.3 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35641 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph A. Kayon
, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Walters, 224 Wis. 2d 897, 901, 591 N.W.2d 874 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4350 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Walters, 224 Wis. 2d 897, 901, 591 N.W.2d 874 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas W. Olen v. Frank K. Phelps
the matter de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7738 - 2017-09-19
the matter de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7738 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. This court need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31