Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Sherman B. Rones
his postconviction motions. He claims that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2005-03-31
his postconviction motions. He claims that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2005-03-31
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
a judgment dismissing his nuisance claim against Akhtar Khwaja and Berlin Cranberry Ltd.[1] Zink contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing his nuisance claim against Akhtar Khwaja and Berlin Cranberry Ltd.[1] Zink contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
asserted that it was “brought due to a claim of Inaccurate Information at Sentencing, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781846 - 2024-03-28
asserted that it was “brought due to a claim of Inaccurate Information at Sentencing, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781846 - 2024-03-28
State v. Steven T. Smith
officer by the name of Deneen McClinton. The State alleged that Smith was the seller. McClinton claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6004 - 2005-03-31
officer by the name of Deneen McClinton. The State alleged that Smith was the seller. McClinton claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6004 - 2005-03-31
Janet M. Klawitter v. Elmer H. Klawitter
use and occupancy of the property barred Elmer’s contribution claim. ¶2 We affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2647 - 2005-03-31
use and occupancy of the property barred Elmer’s contribution claim. ¶2 We affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Franklin
constitutional claim. See id. at ¶¶10-11. No. 99-0743-CR 5 ¶7 In this regard, Franklin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
constitutional claim. See id. at ¶¶10-11. No. 99-0743-CR 5 ¶7 In this regard, Franklin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert G. Harkey
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. NOS. 96-1950-CR 96-2614-CR 2 Harkey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11081 - 2017-09-19
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. NOS. 96-1950-CR 96-2614-CR 2 Harkey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11081 - 2017-09-19
Transportation Insurance Company, Inc. v. Square D Company
caused the electrical arc that injured Houlihan. The basis for Brillion's third-party claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8749 - 2005-03-31
caused the electrical arc that injured Houlihan. The basis for Brillion's third-party claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8749 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 148
Rechsteiner appeals a summary judgment dismissing his claims for negligence, malpractice, and defamation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29155 - 2007-06-26
Rechsteiner appeals a summary judgment dismissing his claims for negligence, malpractice, and defamation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29155 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
theft—in Fond du Lac County Case No. 2018CF68. Any claim that there was no factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016904 - 2025-10-01
theft—in Fond du Lac County Case No. 2018CF68. Any claim that there was no factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016904 - 2025-10-01