Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 29827 for des.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The construction of a written contract presents a question of law that we review de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211809 - 2018-04-25
. The construction of a written contract presents a question of law that we review de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211809 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Nagel
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13302 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 7 ¶13 Even if not waived, Pablo’s contention lacks merit.3 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35641 - 2014-09-15
-CR 7 ¶13 Even if not waived, Pablo’s contention lacks merit.3 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35641 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
interpret § 343.303. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95705 - 2013-04-23
interpret § 343.303. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95705 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
showing is a question of law we review de novo. Baker, 169 Wis. 2d at 78; Ernst, 283 Wis. 2d 300, ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15
showing is a question of law we review de novo. Baker, 169 Wis. 2d at 78; Ernst, 283 Wis. 2d 300, ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶8 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14
restitution presents a question of statutory interpretation subject to de novo review. State v. Ziegler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622237 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21
met. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13268 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Fontaine L. Baker
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
mixed questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶10 If an appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John S.
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
procedures were not constitutionally infirm. ¶16 Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20