Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18231 - 18240 of 40243 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Yolanda M. Spears
[was] not relevant at all to these proceedings." ¶10 The circuit court then received statements from members
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17217 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tyran N. Anderson
. 805.08, unless the defendant waives a jury in writing or by statement in open court or under s. 967.08(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16393 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Guidance to states: Recommendations for developing family drug court guidelines
and Accountability The strategies are statements of how some FDCs have taken action to implement
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/fdcguidelines.pdf - 2021-09-29

State v. David M. Murrell
at trial. DeNeal gave statements to the police after the shooting and to an investigator after trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David M. Murrell
gave testimony which was inconsistent with his testimony at trial. DeNeal gave statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Crampton
court then amplified on its second statement: In other words, if a person is on the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13383 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and killed him. ¶3 At trial, the State admitted into evidence an eight-page statement, created by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98380 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Leamon Hoover
for the jury to see him. We are concerned with defense counsel’s lack of candor in his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sylvester Sigarroa
, the impropriety of the statements by the State’s witness was not so prejudicial as to affect the verdict, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6271 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nathaniel Crampton
the commission of a crime.” The trial court then amplified on its second statement: In other words, if a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31