Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18241 - 18250 of 55649 for n c.

[MS WORD] JD-1803: Order for Extension of Trial Reunification
(3)(c) and 938. 358(3)(c), Wisconsin Statutes This form shall not be modified. It may be supplemented
/formdisplay/JD-1803.doc?formNumber=JD-1803&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-01-07

State of Wisconsin CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM Date: September 24, 2012 To: Clerk of Court o...
2012AP001562 Buffalo County Department of Health & Human Services v. Buffalo Jennifer C. 2012AP001563
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87475 - 2012-09-23

Date: May 2, 2005 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 2 Opinions for Release On May 4, 20...
Kenosha 2004AP001107 Daniel C. Stegvilas v. Teresa D. Stegvilas Kenosha 2004AP001263 Larry Ray Holman v
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18007 - 2005-05-01

State of Wisconsin CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM Date: March 30, 2015 To: Clerk of Court of Ap...
Curiam Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2014AP001219 CR State v. John C. Birk Oconto
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138823 - 2015-03-29

[MS WORD] IW-1740: Motion for Transfer to Tribal Court - Indian Child Welfare Act
§§48.028(3)(c) and 938.028(3)(c), Wisconsin Statutes This form shall not be modified. It may
/formdisplay/IW-1740.doc?formNumber=IW-1740&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-11-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2006 WI 69, ¶23 n.12, 291 Wis. 2d 283, 717 N.W.2d 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699971 - 2023-09-06

Firstar Trust Company v. First National Bank of Kenosha
. Reg. § 20.2002-1; see generally Jeffrey N. Pennell, Tax Payment Provisions and Equitable Apportionment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16875 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Eau Claire County v. Robert P.
seven-day time frame. Essentially, Robert argues that under § 51.20(16)(c), STATS., once a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15161 - 2017-09-21

Eau Claire County v. Robert P.
asserts is a mandatory seven-day time frame. Essentially, Robert argues that under § 51.20(16)(c), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a witness may be communicated with”; and that “[a]n otherwise valid ballot from which a local clerk can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676596 - 2023-07-07