Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18251 - 18260 of 29942 for des.
Search results 18251 - 18260 of 29942 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo. Id. As a general rule, affidavits supporting a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
principles to those facts de novo. Id. As a general rule, affidavits supporting a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
State v. Paul E. Hawkins
review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1999). A plea may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16066 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1999). A plea may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16066 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Adams filed a timely de novo appeal to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The circuit court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106507 - 2014-01-13
Adams filed a timely de novo appeal to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The circuit court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106507 - 2014-01-13
State v. Alex NMI Skoullou
of law which we review de novo. See id. However, we need not consider whether trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11800 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See id. However, we need not consider whether trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11800 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Lindholm
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Fry, 129 Wis. 2d 301, 305, 385 N.W.2d 196, 199 (Ct. App. 1985). Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15938 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman J.
. ¶7 We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5166 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional challenge presents an issue of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Sorenson, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996559 - 2025-08-14
constitutional challenge presents an issue of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Sorenson, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996559 - 2025-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court’s de facto adoption of Wendie’s brief here leaves us guessing about its decision-making process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36288 - 2009-04-27
, the court’s de facto adoption of Wendie’s brief here leaves us guessing about its decision-making process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36288 - 2009-04-27
WI App 76 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP307-CR Complete Titl...
such a showing is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶21, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96029 - 2013-06-25
such a showing is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶21, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96029 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21