Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18251 - 18260 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 18251 - 18260 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from orders that denied her postconviction motion and a motion for clarification and reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839619 - 2024-08-20
from orders that denied her postconviction motion and a motion for clarification and reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839619 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 1 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 1 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
(“Burns-Barr”) appeal from an order denying their motion for attorney fees pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 995.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30
(“Burns-Barr”) appeal from an order denying their motion for attorney fees pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 995.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that his convictions should be reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33046 - 2014-09-15
2 order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that his convictions should be reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33046 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thomas argues that the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
. Thomas argues that the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence credit.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence credit.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel for failing to properly argue Selk’s suppression motion. We disagree. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133828 - 2015-01-28
assistance of counsel for failing to properly argue Selk’s suppression motion. We disagree. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133828 - 2015-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying her post-termination motion for relief from the termination order. Janice claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35479 - 2014-09-15
denying her post-termination motion for relief from the termination order. Janice claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35479 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
court’s denial of Day’s suppression motion, or the sentence imposed. Day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93808 - 2014-09-15
court’s denial of Day’s suppression motion, or the sentence imposed. Day
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93808 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 properly argue Selk’s suppression motion. We disagree. For the reasons set forth below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133828 - 2017-09-21
2 properly argue Selk’s suppression motion. We disagree. For the reasons set forth below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133828 - 2017-09-21