Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18261 - 18270 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18261 - 18270 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 15, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14
The Estate of Jean E. Dorschner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
. ¶3 The court of appeals reviews summary judgment motions de novo. Blazekovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2926 - 2005-03-31
. ¶3 The court of appeals reviews summary judgment motions de novo. Blazekovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2926 - 2005-03-31
Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
. Summary judgment presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14778 - 2005-03-31
. Summary judgment presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommy Smith, Jr.
disagree. ¶18 Construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5651 - 2017-09-19
disagree. ¶18 Construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5651 - 2017-09-19
Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4213 - 2005-03-31
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4213 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 704.27 counterclaim. “‘The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
. Stat. § 704.27 counterclaim. “‘The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
[PDF]
Irene M. Oravecz v. The Medical Protective Co.
review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11956 - 2014-09-15
review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11956 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105815 - 2013-12-18
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105815 - 2013-12-18
James L. Gratz v. Harold E. Gratz
. We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10803 - 2005-03-31
. We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10803 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Treat v. Puckett, 2002 WI App 58, ¶9, 252 Wis. 2d 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66565 - 2014-09-15
of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Treat v. Puckett, 2002 WI App 58, ¶9, 252 Wis. 2d 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66565 - 2014-09-15