Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18261 - 18270 of 45871 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Harkness had been read the Informing the Accused form and refused to submit to a chemical test of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24

State v. Keith A. Glass
such claims are evaluated was set forth in Powell v. State, 86 Wis. 2d 51, 271 N.W.2d 610 (1978): The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James M. Stratton
and requested that he submit to a test of his blood for alcohol as provided by WIS. STAT. § 343.305(3) (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3554 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
343 (Ct. App. 1980). As to the first prong of the Pruitt test, I agree with counsel’s assertion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331990 - 2021-02-04

COURT OF APPEALS
that he was not. Hospital staff performed an initial screening and began blood tests. After the initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14

COURT OF APPEALS
). “This court has formulated the test for harmless or prejudicial error in a variety of ways.” See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06

State v. Ramiro Villareal
. Other acts evidence must pass a two-step test before being admitted. State v. Shillcutt, 116 Wis.2d 227
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8849 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
screening and began blood tests. After the initial screening and blood tests, a hospital staff member
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102985 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jay M. H., M.D. v. Winnebago County DH&HS
address the recantation evidence under the test set forth in State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 561 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24558 - 2017-09-21

Jay M. H., M.D. v. Winnebago County DH&HS
that the court address the recantation evidence under the test set forth in State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24558 - 2006-04-25